“1st International Photographic Button Show, or Revisiting the Button Button Show”

With all of the photo based shows opening up this week around campus, I was inspired to re-visit a display I organized for Scholes library four years ago, the “1st International Photographic Button Show, or Revisiting the Button Button Show.”  buttons on top of crateHarland Snodgrass, professor of painting and video at the College of Ceramics from 1969 to 1985, donated the buttons to Scholes Library back in 2008, along with a series of videotapes he made as a faculty member here.
The “Button Button” show originated in 1976 when Harland sent out over 2000 requests for submittals. Each artist who submitted work was asked to submit four identical images, one of which was returned as a button to the artist while the other three were added to the traveling exhibitions. Submissions came in from all over the United States, as well as Canada, Uruguay, Scotland, and England and, in the end, he received a total of 200 entries.  Each entry was die cut by Harland and made in to a button. The show traveled “from coast to coast,” being exhibited in galleries and museums.
In 2010, Harland sent me an email describing the show, which was first installed in Fosdick Nelson Gallery in March 1977. At the end of the description he explains how one of the buttons contained a hidden video camera and the images of gallery visitors were projected live through a monitor at the front of Fosdick Nelson Gallery.
“The show was a dotted line  – buttons spaced eye height – about 8″apart, all around the entire gallery with late submissions piled up at the entry. buttons_with_CrateAs crowd came in, they cued up and made this slow, shuffling line, following the dots around the entire space. Was wild because of the button’s size, everyone was sucked right up to the walls and the entire center was empty. I made a show poster in the window foam board of the entrance saying BUTTON BUTTON with a 12 ” hole cut out with a video monitor pushed up to it from behind. Looked like one of the buttons except it moved.
I had a very wide lens on a b/w camera and as folks came by the semi hidden camera, while looking closely at the buttons, they became a distorted, graphic part of the advertisement outside the gallery.  Moving button images . . .”    

— Snodgrass, Harland. E-mail to John Hosford, August 30, 2010

In the short time I have known him, Harland has always exhibited a keen sense of community with Alfred and, more specifically, with the School of Art and Design. Button_Button_paperworkHis donations to Scholes Library are “raw materials” that have been boxed, moved, stored, shifted, dropped, photographed, and finally shipped back to the relative comfort of Scholes Library in the village of Alfred, where they can be prodded and coaxed into new forms.
The display in Scholes Library will be up from February 10th through March 10th.
– John Hosford

AU Libraries Count! … Literally!

AU Libraries Count!  Literally!cur_george

Yay libraries!  Everyone values libraries. Who could not love the place that loaned you your first Curious George book?  Or saved you during that hellacious all-nighter on “Nietzsche Meets James Joyce: an Anthropologic Investigation into The Quantum Mechanics of Prose”?  Whether it’s following the Man in the Yellow Hat or citing Hawking’s History of Time, we have all been influenced and rescued by a “good library”.   The value of a good library has rarely been challenged.  For generations, the simple co-location of materials, services and expertise assured a measure of all-around “goodness.”
e
But things have changed.  We have entered an “e-everything” world: E-Books, E-Journals, E-Collections, E-Reserves, E-Zines, E-Publishing, E-Reference, E-Scholarship, and so on.  Many of our most valued resources and services are no longer bound by “place.”   No longer will a high “gate-count”, or a huge number of volumes, a special collection, a quantity of on-site services, or the availability of librarian expertise truly indicate the real value of a library.
Alright then, how can libraries capture and measure their real value?  Well, we do it the old fashioned way.  We count!  Only by collecting and studying meaningful details of your interactions with us can we best express our concrete impact to our community and plan for strategic improvement.  We count a wide variety of interactions that make a difference to your success. Some of the statistics we count are obvious, but we also analyze interactions you may not even recognize as library services.   As a result, the AU Libraries can assure you that you will receive better and more efficient service.  We are measuring a great deal about how, why, where, and when you use the library and we are learning what ways our libraries have value and meaning to you. 
Here are just a few of the things we are analyzing:

  • How you use the library on campus and at a distance
  • Your most frequently asked questions
  • Time required to help you
  • Which curriculums/assignments need most assistance
  • Which services/resources you use (or don’t use)
  • Time of day/week/month/year you use services
  • Most common issues with our services/resources
  • How service is delivered (phone, text, in library, on the street, drop in, department, etc.)
  • Number of instruction sessions we teach, to whom, on what topics, etc.
  • Collaborations with instructors
  • Website usage, including popular research paths, visitor locations, usage patterns, and electronic library guides
  • Remote loaning/borrowing and document delivery transactions  (what are we borrowing/lending, to/from who, in what areas, when, etc.)

From data like this we discover where we can:

  • Improve staffing patterns and locationslan-dash
  • Enhance or introduce new services
  • Improve current services
  • Discover both strengths and weaknesses in our collections
  • Learn which services are under-utilized
  • Uncover impediments to efficiency
  • Identify courses that could benefit from customized instruction sessions
  • Help you use your time most efficiently
  • Better understand your assignments
  • Cultivate collaborations with faculty
  • Build a more meaningful instruction program

These are just a few measurements and potential outcomes.  Over the course of the coming semesters we will build a substantial databank of valuable information on how you use the AU Libraries.   This is certainly a painstaking process, but your librarians and library staff are excited to see what we uncover.


Yes indeed, AU Libraries Count!  
 In More Ways Than One!

count

– Mark A. Smith

Welcome to the Alfred University Library News Blog!

This blog, which we’ll more fully start posting to in January, is a replacement for the previously separate Herrick and Scholes Library blogs.  Since much of our news was relevant to both libraries, we decided to consolidate!

While we’ll certainly be using this blog to keep you up to date on official library news, it will also be much more than that.  We’ll be covering everything from our collections and services to theme posts dealing with university events, interviews with students and faculty, and, of course, news about upcoming library events or policy changes.  This eclectic mix will be made even more varied by our range of contributors, librarians and staff members from both the Scholes and Herrick Libraries.  Though many of our posts will be relevant to both libraries, some will give you the opportunity to explore a facet of one of the libraries more in-depth.

We welcome your feedback and questions in the comments section, and, while we’re at it, any suggestions for future blog posts!  Feel free to leave us a note about anything you think we should write about in the future.

More coming soon!